Thursday 01/01/2026
This morning I had to edit the spreadsheet with my crossword numbers, to set up for a new year. This Numbers file has sheets for every year from 2013 through 2025, and now, 2026. What is on each sheet? Columns for the days of the week, in which I record the time it takes to complete the LA Times crossword puzzle. Each day. There is also a sheet of graphs and statistics, because what good are raw numbers if you don’t make graphs of them? Here is the summary graph for the days Monday-Saturday, from 2013 through 2025.

This graph doesn’t show Sunday, because Sunday, which is actually the big NY Times puzzle, takes 35-40 minutes. If I include those times, the other days of the week get squished down to the bottom of the graph and it’s harder to see the trends.
The point of all this, besides being conclusive proof that I’m a nerd, is to watch for deterioration in my mental capacity. And there is some, although not significant. Yet. The LA Times puzzles, like the ones in the NY Times, are graded in difficulty through the week. Look at the blue and green lines, the Monday and Tuesday times. These are the easiest puzzles. In 2013, my Monday puzzle times ranged from 6.5 to 9 minutes, with an average around 7. In 2025, Monday takes 8-12 with an average a bit under 10. That’s like 30% slower.
The picture for the other days of the week isn’t as clear. (I think the jumps around 2014-15 must reflect a change of editors, or something systematic that made all the puzzles harder in 2015, and then went back to normal.) Looking at Wed-Thu-Fri, from 2020 on, I had slightly faster times for 2025 versus 2024. That would be reassuring except for the spike in Saturday times.
The Saturday puzzle is more cryptic and has always taken 18-22 minutes to do. But there are days when I give up and don’t finish. What time should I record then? I elected to show only the times when I actually finish the puzzle, and to keep a separate tally of DNF days. In 2025, there were 19 Saturdays when I did not finish the puzzle. In 2024 there were 20, so no change in that.
Anyway, bottom line, possible minor deterioration, brain still basically functional.
I picked up my supper sack at 9:30, then spent another hour in the music practice room. Here’s a song I am having trouble with: “Bring it on home” by Sam Cooke. You think you know something about music? Count that out. What’s the time signature? I am pretty sure it’s 6/8 but nothing, nothing happens exactly on the downbeat. It sounds so simple. Hah.
Jerry and Betty had invited me, Joanne, and Kay for lunch. This was a nice group. Kay was just back from visiting her daughter and grandchildren in Porto, Portugal. So we talked about what she saw there. I had brought an idea I had formed this morning. The SJ Merc had included a wrap-up of the best pop albums of the year, and of course I know zilch about any of the performers. And I thought, you know, we’re all stuck in the 60s and 70s musically, how about we have a regular event where we sit and listen to an entire album by somebody younger than our children? I proposed this and everybody jumped on it as a great idea. So I will look into creating such an event in coming months.
Then with the rain stopped and clouds clearing, Joanne and I went for my standard walk, crossing the creek twice. It’s flowing strong now.
Drowsed and napped for a couple hours, then it was time for another picnic supper. Just five of us in the 6th floor dining room, everybody else out with their relatives I guess.
